APK Review Lab
Blue Door Kiosk

Blue Door Kiosk

Redcat Pty Ltd
Version 3.6 Trusted App
4.5 2143 Reviews
Aug 22 Updated
Rated for 3+ Rating
Android 6.0+ Android
94.1 MB Size

About Blue Door Kiosk

Idris
Reviewed by
Idris Content Editor

The moment you open the Blue Door Kiosk app

The screen loads with a view of the beach — at least that is the idea. The app wants you to relax, order your coffee, and never wait in line again. But the reality hits different. You tap the icon, the app opens, and you are immediately faced with a choice: log in or create an account. For a first-time user, this is where the trouble starts. Multiple reviews from the App Store and Play Store mention that account creation fails outright, leaving the app useless for that session. One reviewer wrote that they downloaded the app and could not create an account at all. So right from the first second, the app puts a barrier between you and your coffee. The onboarding flow asks for personal details, email, and payment info before you have even seen a menu. This is not a simple tap-and-order setup. It is a full registration process. The app is built by Redcat Pty Ltd, a hospitality IT company based in Australia, and it is clearly designed for repeat customers who are willing to invest the time to set up their profile. But for a casual visitor at Merewether Beach, that investment feels heavy.

Once you are past the login screen, the app presents its core promise: order ahead, skip the queue, pay with your phone. The interface shows a menu of coffee, food, acai bowls, and the famous Coco Whip vegan soft serve. The layout is clean but dense. You scroll through categories, select items, choose modifications, and add them to your cart. The process is functional but not fast. The app saves your favorite orders and card details, which is meant to speed things up for future visits. In practice, the saved orders feature does reduce the number of taps — but only if you order the same thing every time. If you want something different, you are back to navigating the full menu. The loyalty program is built into the app, so every purchase earns points toward future rewards. That is a strong incentive to keep using the app instead of ordering at the counter.

When the loyalty program clashes with the ordering flow

Here is where the app's design creates a real contradiction. The loyalty program is designed to reward frequent use. But the ordering process itself is so cumbersome that it discourages frequent use. Multiple sources — including user reviews on AppBrain and Top-rated.online — complain that it takes about ten steps to place an order, even for a repeat order. Ten taps to buy a coffee is a lot. The loyalty points are supposed to make the app worth the effort. But if the effort to earn those points is too high, the value of the reward diminishes. This is a classic UX trap: the incentive and the friction are working against each other. You earn points for using the app, but using the app is a chore. The result is that users who want the loyalty benefits are forced to tolerate a clunky ordering process. Users who just want a quick coffee will skip the app and order at the counter — but then they miss out on the points. The app forces a trade-off that does not need to exist. A simpler ordering flow would make the loyalty program more attractive, not less. Instead, the app's own structure undermines its primary retention tool.

The friction extends to other areas as well. One review on Top-rated.online describes a ridiculous situation: you can only order alternative milk (Bonsoy) through the app, not at the counter. So if you are a dairy-free drinker and you want your coffee made with Bonsoy, you are forced to use the app — even if you are standing right at the counter. This is not a technical limitation. It is a deliberate policy decision by the cafe. The app becomes a gatekeeper for a specific product. That makes sense from a business perspective — it drives app adoption. But from a user experience perspective, it is frustrating. You are at the counter, the staff are right there, and yet you have to pull out your phone, open the app, navigate the menu, and place the order digitally. The staff cannot simply take your order and select Bonsoy. They redirect you to the app. This kind of forced digital interaction creates resentment, especially for older customers or those who are not comfortable with mobile ordering.

Real-world performance: bugs, crashes, and the price of convenience

The app does not have a reputation for smooth performance. Reviews across multiple platforms mention crashes, freezes, and general instability. One iOS reviewer noted that the app would not let them create an account at all. Another said the app is "getting worse with time." The version changelog on the Play Store says only "Updated Functionality and Minor Bug Fixes" — a generic phrase that gives no real information about what was fixed. This lack of transparency is common, but it does not inspire confidence. When users encounter bugs, they want to know that the developer is actively addressing them. The vague changelog suggests the opposite: that the updates are minor and not worth detailing. The app is free to download, so the financial barrier is low. But the time barrier is real. If the app crashes during the ordering process, you lose your progress and have to start over. That is a significant cost for someone standing in line at a busy beach cafe.

Performance issues are not limited to crashes. The app's responsiveness can be slow, especially when loading the menu or processing payments. The app uses secure payment processing and encrypts data in transit, which is a positive security feature. But encryption and security do not matter if the app is frustrating to use. The cafe itself is known for good coffee and friendly service, according to multiple reviews on Tripadvisor and Sluurpy. But the app does not always reflect that same level of quality. Users who have a great experience at the cafe may have a poor experience with the app, which creates a disconnect between the brand and its digital touchpoint. The app is supposed to enhance the cafe experience, not detract from it. In its current state, it often does the opposite.

The app also collects personal information, financial information, and other data types. The Play Store data safety section notes that data is encrypted in transit and that users can request deletion of their data. This is standard practice, but it is worth noting that the app does collect a fair amount of personal data. For a coffee ordering app, that level of data collection might feel excessive to some users. The developer, Redcat Pty Ltd, has been operating since 1999 and is a established hospitality IT provider. So the app is backed by a company with experience. But experience does not always translate to a smooth user experience.

The specific technical detail that stops the flow

The app requires you to save your preferred payment method to enable quick checkout. This is presented as a convenience feature. But it also means that if you do not want to save your card details, the checkout process becomes longer. You have to enter your payment information manually every time. The app does not offer a guest checkout option. You must create an account and save at least one payment method to use the app at all. This is a significant barrier for first-time users or tourists who just want to buy a coffee and a Coco Whip. The app's architecture is built around the assumption that you are a regular customer who will return frequently. That assumption does not hold for everyone. The app is tied to a specific physical location — Merewether Beach in Newcastle, Australia. If you are visiting from out of town, the app has limited utility beyond that single visit. Yet you still have to go through the full registration and payment setup. The app does not offer a lightweight, one-time-use mode. This design choice reflects the developer's focus on loyalty and retention, but it comes at the cost of accessibility and ease of use for casual visitors.

Screenshots

App Specifications

Latest Version3.6
Uploaded byRedcat Pty Ltd
Requires AndroidAndroid 6.0+
CategoryFood & Drink
Content RatingRated for 3+

Technical Details

Package Nameau.com.redcat.bluedoor
LanguagesEnglish
Architecturearm64-v8a
Signature6f1e5dd758e25a4bbafd373f81973eb6740728143f0615002c2eed360a270ce3

Security & Additional Info

Scan Result Secure
Package Name au.com.redcat.bluedoor
SHA‑256 6f1e5dd758e25a4bbafd373f81973eb6740728143f0615002c2eed360a270ce3
SHA‑1 3b2306ed6e4a9a840952578e117f07928c14285d
App Permissions 0
View Security Report Google Play

Previous Versions

Blue Door … 3.6 57.3 MB • Jun 24, 2023
Get
Blue Door … 2.7 61.8 MB • Aug 26, 2022
Get
Blue Door … 2.3 42.0 MB • Oct 27, 2021
Get
Blue Door … 2.1 41.0 MB • Mar 04, 2021
Get