Chakras Test

The app opens to a simple screen with a single button labeled "Start Test." There is no welcome message, no tutorial, and no explanation of what the test entails. Tapping the button immediately presents the first question: a statement about feeling grounded, with a slider from "Never" to "Always." The interface is minimal — white background, basic font, and a progress bar at the top. This is the onboarding reality of Chakras Test: a bare-bones assessment tool that assumes you already know what chakras are and why you are here. The lack of onboarding is not a bug; it is a design choice that prioritizes speed over education.

The test consists of 28 questions, four for each of the seven chakras. Each question is a statement like "I feel secure in my life" or "I express my thoughts clearly." The user slides a bar from 1 to 5. The questions are straightforward, but the phrasing is sometimes awkward — a sign that the developer may not be a native English speaker. After answering all questions, the app generates a results screen with a bar chart showing the balance level of each chakra, from "blocked" to "overactive." Below the chart, it lists personalized recommendations: specific meditations, affirmations, and activities for each chakra that scored low. The recommendations are generic — "Meditate on your root chakra" or "Repeat 'I am safe' daily" — but they are at least specific to the chakra in question.

How Recommendations and Self-Assessment Interact

The app's core loop is simple: answer questions, get a chart, receive recommendations. But the interaction between the self-assessment and the recommendations is where the app's logic becomes visible. The recommendations are not random; they are tied directly to the scores. A low root chakra score triggers grounding exercises; a low heart chakra score triggers compassion-focused affirmations. However, the app does not explain why a particular recommendation is given for a particular score. The user is left to infer the connection. This is a missed opportunity for education. The app could have included a brief explanation of each chakra and why certain practices are recommended. Instead, it presents the results as a static report. The recommendations are text-based and do not include audio or video guidance, which limits their practical utility. The user must seek out additional resources to actually perform the meditations or affirmations.

The results screen also includes a "Share" button, allowing users to export their chakra balance chart as an image. This feature is useful for tracking progress over time, but the app does not save results internally. Each test is a fresh start. There is no history log, no way to compare past results with current ones. This is a significant limitation for users who want to monitor their chakra balance over weeks or months. The app's design assumes a one-time use, which contradicts the holistic wellness philosophy it promotes. A user who takes the test weekly would have to manually record their results elsewhere.

Real-World Performance and Limitations

The app performs smoothly on basic Android devices. The slider responds without lag, and the results render quickly. The APK size is moderate, and the app does not request any permissions — no storage, no location, no camera. This is a positive aspect, as it respects user privacy. However, the app's performance is undercut by its lack of depth. The questions are repetitive across chakras — many are variations of "I feel [emotion]" or "I am [state]." This can make the test feel tedious after the first few questions. The results are presented as a static chart with no interactive elements. Tapping on a chakra bar does not reveal more information or additional recommendations. The app feels like a basic quiz generator rather than a comprehensive wellness tool.

The developer, Luis Michel, is based in Tartagal, Salta, Argentina. The app is one of several from "Michel Apps," a small developer with a handful of lifestyle apps. The lack of reviews and ratings on the Play Store suggests the app has a very small user base. This is not necessarily a negative — it means the app is niche and has not been widely tested. But it also means there is no community feedback to validate the accuracy or usefulness of the chakra assessments. The app's description mentions "intuitive and friendly interface," but the actual interface is utilitarian at best. It is not visually engaging; there are no colors, no icons, no animations. The bar chart is the only visual element.

The app does not require an internet connection to function. All questions and recommendations are stored locally. This is a plus for users in areas with poor connectivity. However, it also means the app cannot update its content dynamically. The recommendations are static and will not evolve based on new research or user feedback. The version history shows the app was last updated in December 2024, but the changelog is empty. It is unclear what, if anything, changed in that update. The app's version number is 3.4, suggesting it has been through several iterations, but the lack of a changelog makes it impossible to know what improvements were made.

The app's privacy policy is not explicitly stated on the Play Store page, but the data safety section indicates that no data is collected and no data is shared with third parties. This is a strong privacy stance, especially for a wellness app that deals with personal energy assessments. Users can feel confident that their answers are not being harvested for advertising or analytics. The app does not require an account or login, which further reduces the risk of data exposure. This simplicity is both a strength and a weakness: it is easy to use, but it offers no cloud sync or backup.

The test itself takes about 5-7 minutes to complete, depending on how quickly the user reads and slides. The questions are all on a single screen with a scrollable list, which is a common UX pattern but can feel overwhelming. A paginated approach would have been more user-friendly. The results are displayed immediately after the last question, with no delay. The bar chart uses a color gradient from red (blocked) to green (balanced) to blue (overactive), which is intuitive. The recommendations are listed below the chart in plain text, with no formatting or prioritization. The user must read through all seven chakras' recommendations to find the most critical ones.

The app's lack of audio or video content is a notable omission. Many users expect guided meditations or visualizations as part of a chakra balancing app. The text-based recommendations are a starting point, but they require the user to already know how to meditate or perform affirmations. The app does not offer any instruction on these practices. This limits its usefulness for beginners. A user who is new to chakras would need to seek external resources to implement the recommendations. The app functions more as a diagnostic tool than a complete wellness solution.

The app's free price point is appropriate for its current feature set. There are no ads, no in-app purchases, and no premium tier. This is refreshing in a market where many wellness apps are subscription-based. However, the lack of monetization also raises questions about the app's long-term sustainability. The developer may not have the resources to invest in significant updates or new features. The app's current state feels like a minimum viable product — it works, but it lacks polish and depth. The user base is small, and the app's growth potential is uncertain.

The app's permissions are minimal — it requests no permissions at all. This is a strong selling point for privacy-conscious users. The app does not access the device's storage, camera, microphone, or location. It does not require internet access for core functionality. This means the app can be used entirely offline, which is a benefit for users who are concerned about data tracking. The app's data safety declaration confirms that no data is collected or shared, which aligns with the permission list.